Team Leadership Culture
  • Team
  • Leadership
  • Culture
  • Myers-Briggs
  • Trust Me
  • Short Book Reviews
Top Posts
Obituary
REPOST: Four Functions, Three Rules
ROUNDUP: The Rise of AI
REPOST: Facing Adversity Series
ROUNDUP: Curiousity
ROUNDUP: Deep Work
REPOST: Character vs. Competence
REPOST: Opposite of Victim
REPOST: Listening With the Intent to Understand
REPOST: Performance vs Trust
  • About
  • Services
  • Resources
    • Trust Me
    • Short Book Reviews
  • Contact

Team Leadership Culture

  • Team
  • Leadership
  • Culture
  • Myers-Briggs
  • Trust Me
  • Short Book Reviews
Tag:

Humility

BlogCulture

The Three Most Misunderstood Words in Business

by Ron Potter November 17, 2016

photo-1464958674501-4dc3d73d8f46

Knowing something is different than knowing the name of something.

Shane Parrish of Farnam Street Blog spoke of this concept from Richard Feynman, the Nobel winning Physicist.

The Feynman Technique formula for learning is based on knowing the difference.  I want to talk about the three words that seem to suffer from this concept.

Humble, Love and Tolerant

Humble

Most people seem to think that being humble is a weakness.  They relate it to being a push over or a doormat.  They think that humble people don’t stand up to the pressure of their own convictions.  Quite the contrary.

The original word for humility is tightly coupled with the word meek (also completely misunderstood).  But the word meek meant tremendous power under complete control.  A humble or meek person has all the power they need to wield; they simply keep it under control so that they can relate to and understand others.

Humility is derived from the Latin word humus meaning grounded.  A humble leader is well grounded, standing firm.

Humility requires leaders to shed all their prejudices and biases and examine who they are and what they have become.  Humility leads to openness, teachability and flexibility.

Love

I know of at least two situations where I have either been asked to use a different word or was asked not to work in a company because “Business is a rough and tumble world with no room for foolish things like love.”  Aristotle speaks of love as being one of the key elements to the highest level of happiness and the framework for great team work.  The Greeks had at least 3 words that translate into our one English world love.  Agape, the word that Aristotle used refers to how we treat other people, not about being emotionally or physically “in love” with them.  How we respect and treat others (boss, peers, direct reports, customers, investors, etc.) has everything to do with business.  Love may be the leading indicator of success in business.

Tolerate

This word is widely used in many situations today and I will assume that people mean well by it.  But in some cases, behavior reflects the true meaning of the word rather than the implied meaning.

The medical definition of tolerate is: “be capable of continued subjection to (a drug, toxin, or environmental condition) without adverse reaction.”  The non-medical definition sends the same signal: “accept or endure (someone or something unpleasant or disliked) with forbearance”

Neither of those definitions is very pleasant and shouldn’t be tolerated.

What we mean to say is have patience.

Once again people assume the word patience means to not hold people accountable.  But the true concept of the word infers calmness, stability and persistent courage in trying circumstances.  It speaks of respect for others when there is disagreement.

Be humble, love one another and have some patience.  Everyone is unique.  Out of that uniqueness can be built great teams.

tlc-meme-11%2f17

0 comments
0 FacebookTwitterEmail
BlogTrust Me

Adversity and Discouragement

by Ron Potter October 24, 2016

photo-1431887915357-68b819fae322

“A man stopped to watch a Little League baseball game. He asked one of the youngsters what the score was. ‘We’re losing 18-0’ was the answer.
‘Well,’ said the man. ‘I must say you don’t look discouraged.’
‘Discouraged?’ the boy said, puzzled. ‘Why should we be discouraged? We haven’t come to bat yet.’ ”

Discouraged? Hardly. The boy was holding strong to the hope that his team could overcome any deficit. He was holding strong to his convictions.
No matter what the source may be, discouragement and adversity have a purpose:

  • to deal with our pride
  • to get our attention
  • to get us to change our behavior
  • to prepare us for future service

There are some wrong responses to adversity and discouragement, and they cause bitterness, doubt, depression, and hopelessness. But holding strong produces some right responses:

  • We gain our team’s trust because our actions match our intentions.
  • We focus on seeing things through rather than abandoning our values or vision.
  • We rely on God for the ability to endure.

We want you to build courage and persevere, to realize the sweet taste of standing strong for the long haul. Endurance.

No matter what the source may be, discouragement and adversity have a purpose: to deal with our pride, to get our attention, to get us to change our behavior, and to prepare us for the future.

Dogged endurance is an important quality, but if it is directed down the wrong path, it can damage people, teams, and organizations. To endure, a leader must build on a foundation of humility, trust, compassion, commitment, focus, and integrity. Without holding firm to the other seven attributes on your way to endurance, you can never be assured that you are staying on the true and right path.
Have you developed a leadership style (one that includes humility, trust, compassion, and integrity of a Trust-Me leader) that has equipped you to endure? If not, where has the process broken down for you? What steps do you need to take to change your style?

tlc-meme-15

0 comments
0 FacebookTwitterEmail
Short Book Reviews

Presence

by Ron Potter August 2, 2016

Ron’s Short Review: This whole concept of presence is a powerful one. It relates to true humbleness, great listening, being who you are in all circumstances. Great leadership lessons.

0 comments
0 FacebookTwitterEmail
BlogTrust Me

Building Team Dynamics – Part I

by Ron Potter August 1, 2016

photo-1454006639960-af9b6a303eae

Often, the basic question from leaders is reduced to “How do I build teams without blowing the place up?” Following are some suggestions.

Start with the “Two Pillars”

This book is centered on eight principles of successful leadership. What we call the “two pillars”—the key principles that support and are intertwined with the others—are humility and endurance. A leader who desires to build a great team must first become a leader of humility and endurance. Pride and despair always force leaders to choose incorrect methods and solutions.

It is difficult to build a team when you need to be the center of attention, the only voice, the only one with an idea, and the only one who can make a decision. It is also difficult to build a team when, at every sour turn, the team stumbles and fails or doesn’t learn from failure. Endurance means pushing through struggles together until the results are positive. Leaders, by the way they respond to crisis and chaos, often cause teams to quit sooner than necessary.

Michael Gershman, in his book Getting It Right the Second Time, squeezes forty-seven case studies into 256 pages. All teach one lesson: humility. And one credo: Try anything. Keep trying. Maybe you’ll get it right someday. Endurance.

The two pillars, humility and endurance, produce leaders who are ready to excite, energize, and develop teams.

Understand, Accept, and Communicate Change

The business world has begun to see the need for entirely new models of management in order to succeed in regaining and defending competitiveness in today’s world economy. The old paradigm of management that had guided the U.S. economy since the rise of the railroads and the large corporations of the Industrial Revolution no longer seems to work. Firms struggled to remake themselves in order to be competitive.

Today we live in a rapidly changing postindustrial society that is becoming increasingly complex and fluid. It is an environment that requires decision making and sometimes rapid change within organizations. Surviving and thriving in this rapidly changing landscape becomes a function of an organization’s ability to learn, grow, and break down institutional structures within the organization that impede growth. Organizations that are ideologically committed to growth and change will be at an advantage in the postindustrial era.

In his book Leading Change, John Kotter explains how leaders can effectively communicate change in their organizations. All of us at one time or another fully understand the confusion caused by change. Kotter writes,

Because the communication of vision [change] is often such a difficult activity, it can easily turn into a screeching, one-way broadcast in which useful feedback is ignored and employees are inadvertently made to feel unimportant. In highly successful change efforts, this rarely happens, because communication always becomes a two-way endeavor.

Even more important than two-way discussion are methods used to help people answer all the questions that occur during times of change and chaos. Clear, simple, often-repeated communication that comes from multiple sources and is inclusive of people’s opinions and fears is extremely helpful and productive.

0 comments
0 FacebookTwitterEmail
Short Book Reviews

Break Free of the Drama Triangle

by Ron Potter July 2, 2016

Ron’s Short Review: This was the second book I read this month on the topic of the Drama Triangle. This one gives a little more understand of how we get into and out of the triangle where the other book gives a deeper description of each role. Except for their misunderstanding of Religion (man trying to reach God) vs Christianity (God reaching out to man), a common mistake, they give a pretty good path to help avoid the consequences.

0 comments
0 FacebookTwitterEmail
Short Book Reviews

The Drama Triangle

by Ron Potter July 1, 2016

Ron‘s Short Review: Old concept and old book but a great reminder of how people fall into the Drama Triangle (Persecutor, Rescuer, Victim). She gives good descriptions of each type which helps develop a framework to see the triangle as it plays out.

0 comments
0 FacebookTwitterEmail
Short Book Reviews

Helping

by Ron Potter May 3, 2016


Helping- How to Offer, Give, and Receive HelpRon’s Short Review:

I consider Edgar Schein one of the fathers of Organizational Culture thinking.  Read anything by Edgar and you’ll be learning something worthwhile.  In this simple book however, he gives some astounding advice on helping people in the most impactful way from your employee to your spouse to your child.  His framework of the roles of client and helper will quickly explain so much about why attempting to help sometimes works and sometimes doesn’t.
Amazon-Buy-Buttonkindle-buy button

0 comments
0 FacebookTwitterEmail
Short Book Reviews

The Coaching Habit

by Ron Potter March 31, 2016

The Coaching HabitRon’s Short Review:

The subtitle says it all: Change the way you lead forever!  This quick, small book with seven great questions will change the way you lead.  Worth reading.

Amazon-Buy-Buttonkindle-buy button

0 comments
0 FacebookTwitterEmail
BlogTrust Me

Characteristics of a “You-First” Leader

by Ron Potter March 14, 2016

photo-1417037129170-06a2750eaa47One way to find out whether a leader has a “you-first” perspective is to ask, “Do others grow as individuals under this person’s leadership?” While benefiting from this leader’s compassion, do others become healthier, wiser, freer, more autonomous, and more likely themselves to develop a “you-first” attitude?

The following qualities define a leader who is committed to being last rather than first:

1. Commitment to the growth of people

In their book The Leadership Challenge, James Kouzes and Barry Posner write, “Any leadership practice that increases another’s sense of self-confidence, self-determination, and personal effectiveness makes that person more powerful and greatly enhances the possibility of success.”

A commitment to growing people is not a temporary fix, a quick solution to a problem, or a short-term shot in the arm that helps them only today. Commitment to growth is a long-term investment in other people. It increases their opportunities to grow, learn, and use what they have learned to its greatest benefit. When their growth multiplies, the organization’s growth and maturity multiplies.

2. Listening

Good leaders are too often viewed as being great verbal communicators and decision makers. While these attributes are important, leaders need to expand their leadership style to include a deep commitment to listening to others. How can an effective leader understand the needs of his or her employees, customers, suppliers, or market without listening intently to them? Psychologist Dr. Joyce Brothers remarked, “Listening, not imitation, may be the sincerest form of flattery.”

What made a difference for me was when I finally grasped the concept of listening with the intent to understand. I had always listened with the intent to respond. The entire time I was listening, my mind was developing responses, recording counterpoints, cataloging quick points that I was sure the other person would find helpful when I responded. Listening with the intent to respond is not compassionate. It is not humble. It’s self-focused. Listening with the intent to understand is indeed focused on the other person.

As I work with leaders and spend time listening with the intent to understand, I’m amazed at how much they are willing to share with me when they know I fully intend not to just hear them but also to understand.

3. Awareness

Both self-awareness and general awareness direct leaders to better understand situations and people. Robert Greenleaf wrote, “Awareness is not a giver of solace—it is just the opposite. It is a disturber and an awakener. Able leaders are usually sharply aware and reasonably disturbed. They are not seekers after solace. They have their own inner serenity.”

Awareness helps leaders discern how to properly put others first.

4. Empathy

This is identifying with and understanding another’s situation, feelings, and motives. People need to know they are accepted and recognized for their special gifts and talents.

5. Healing

One of the greatest assets of a “you-first” leader is the ability to approach another person as a healer in a spirit of help and compassion.

6. Persuasion over power

Many times when a job is hard to do, poor leaders rely on sheer power rather than persuasion. The compassionate leader seeks to engage others rather than force compliance. There’s a desire to build consensus rather than use authoritarian power. Compelling stories, sometimes called parables help people see not only a different perspective but often how things can be better for them. Power trips and plays deflate people and do not allow them to think for themselves.

This list of six characteristics of a “you-first” leader is by no means exhaustive, but each quality is fundamental if you want compassion to be a key component of your leadership style.

0 comments
0 FacebookTwitterEmail
BlogLeadership

Become a Better Learner

by Ron Potter March 3, 2016

photo-1444653389962-8149286c578aThat’s the headline from a Harvard Business Review article I read today.  Being a better and continual learner is one of the strong indicators of great leaders.  All great leaders are great learners.  But the first line of the article is what captured my interest even more.  It said:

“Staying within your comfort zone is a good way to prepare for today but a terrible way to prepare for tomorrow.”

Now that is a wonderful line.

I’ve worked with Dr. Dan Denison for a number of years.  Dan created the Denison Culture Survey which in my experience is still the best culture survey on the market today.  But it was something Dan said years ago that has always captured my interest.  Dan is an amateur race car driver and he really enjoys the sport.  During one conversation he said “If you’re always in control as go around the track you’re not going fast enough to win.”  Race winners are always out of control at some point during the circuit.

None of us likes to be out of control or out of our comfort zone for long.  But personal learning and growth or even winning races require that we step out of that comfort zone or reach beyond our control at least some of the time.

One of the advancements we’ve all seen taking place the last few years is in “big data”.  By analyzing huge amounts of data new learnings are beginning to emerge that were just impossible to see in the past.  It’s amazing to me how IBM’s Watson is now being applied to medical situations and other environments to help the experts in the field see new information or see new patterns in the old information.  However, I’ve also seen a dangerous pattern in corporate leadership that assumes more data and information will help leaders make more informed and better decisions about the future.  Let me cycle back to the quote that started this post:

“Staying within your comfort zone is a good way to prepare for today but a terrible way to prepare for tomorrow.”

More data may help us prepare for and react better today, but we still need to get out of our comfort zone and let go of complete control to make good decisions about tomorrow.  Making decisions about tomorrow requires a different skill set than making decisions about today.

You may be better skilled on one side of this equation or the other.  Often I see partnerships where the Chief Operating Officer is good at making today’s decisions, the Chief Executive Officer is good at anticipating the future.  Corporate Controllers are good at making today’s decisions, Chief Financial Officers are good at preparing for the future.  I can think of this combination at almost every level of the organization.  So how do you build both skills into the organization?  TEAM.  Building great teams that are good at all aspects of today and tomorrow and learning how to balance the needs of the company are the winners in the end.  Sometimes you just need to get out of your comfort zone or let things get out of control for a moment to win!

Which side of this equation do you fall on?  Who have your partnered or teamed with that helps balance your comfort zone or need for control?

team-leadership-culture-meme-11

0 comments
0 FacebookTwitterEmail
BlogTrust Me

You First

by Ron Potter February 29, 2016

photo-1444076295597-e246c794dc5fCompassion is not easy or cheap. A leader who sincerely seeks to understand and care for others will pay a price. But the rewards are satisfying and great.

This post will examine compassion from the perspective of a “you-first” leader—the man or woman whose focus is on responding to the needs of employees, customers, and community before his or her own needs.

I urge you to be to be a person and leader known for radical acts of compassion. Here’s an incredible example:

It was 1944, and Bert Frizen was an infantryman on the front lines in Europe. American forces had advanced in the face of intermittent shelling and small-arms fire throughout the morning hours, but now all was quiet. His patrol reached the edge of a wooded area with an open field before them. Unknown to the Americans, a battery of Germans waited in a hedgerow about two hundred yards across the field.

Bert was one of two scouts who moved out into the clearing. Once he was halfway across the field, the remainder of his battalion followed. Suddenly, the Germans opened fire, and machine gun fire ripped into both of Bert’s legs. The American battalion withdrew into the woods for protection, while a rapid exchange of fire continued.

Bert lay helplessly in a small stream as shots volleyed overhead. There seemed to be no way out. To make matters worse, he now noticed that a German soldier was crawling toward him. Death appeared imminent; he closed his eyes and waited. To his surprise, a considerable period passed without the expected attack, so he ventured opening his eyes again. He was startled to see the German kneeling at his side, smiling. He then noticed that the shooting had stopped. Troops from both sides of the battlefield watched anxiously. Without any verbal exchange, this mysterious German reached down to lift Bert in his arms and proceeded to carry him to the safety of Bert’s comrades.

Having accomplished his self-appointed mission, and still without speaking a word, the German soldier turned and walked back across the field to his own troop. No one dared break the silence of this sacred moment. Moments later the cease-fire ended, but not before all those present had witnessed how one man risked everything for his enemy.

 

How would your business, your family, your community—our world—be better if more of these radical acts of compassion occurred on a daily basis?

An entire, well-established management perspective called the Servant-Leader has evolved from this concept of service to others. Robert K. Greenleaf of AT&T first used the term servant leadership in an early essay.

This is a very counterintuitive notion in a day when competition is fierce in nearly every area of life. You can’t “look out for number 1” and say “you first” at the same time. So then how do we learn to put others first?

Over the following weeks, we’ll be taking a deeper look at being a “You-First” leader through the Trust Me posts. Tune back in and join the discussion and share with your friends.

0 comments
0 FacebookTwitterEmail
BlogLeadership

Decoding Leadership: What Really Matters

by Ron Potter January 21, 2016

photo-1452573992436-6d508f200b30

That’s the title of a recent McKinsey Quarterly Report.  Great stuff.  What does really matter?

In typical McKinsey style they described their survey approach:

  • We started with our own list and relevant literature list of 20 traits.
  • We surveyed a large number of people
  • In a large number of organizations
  • Compared it to our healthy organization index
  • Boiled it down to 4 traits that explained 89% of the differences between strong and weak organizations in terms of leadership effectiveness.

Big organizations like McKinsey are really good at doing these large scale analysis projects and I really appreciate their ability to do it and their willingness to share it.

4 Traits explained nearly 90% of the difference between good and bad leadership effectiveness.  What were the four (you should be asking at this point)?

  • Being supportive
  • Operate with strong results orientation
  • Seek different perspectives
  • Solve problems effectively

The article doesn’t indicate that these are in any particular order so for our evaluation let’s separate out the 2nd one, Operate with strong results orientation.  People want to accomplish things.  People want to build, create, produce, provide goods and services that other people value.  Without both sides of that equation: people wanting valuable products and people wanted to produce value, there would be no commerce at all.  Yes, we all want results.  All too often leaders assume that people don’t want to produce and don’t realize that it’s the culture and structure that they’ve created that prevents them from doing so.

The other three require a humility and openness to accomplish.

Being supportive requires that I’m interested in who you are, how you think and what you want to create and accomplish.

Being open to your perspectives requires that I’m interested in who you are, how you think and what you want to create and accomplish.

Being good at solving problems effectively requires that I’m interested in who you are, how you think and what you want to create and accomplish.

Being supportive, open and a good problem solver requires humility!

Every piece of valid research on leadership effectiveness you find will somehow have its foundation based on humility.  Ego and hubris reflect the needs of the person in the leadership position.  Humility starts with the needs of the people being led.

 

0 comments
0 FacebookTwitterEmail
Newer Posts
Older Posts
  • Facebook
  • Twitter
  • Linkedin
  • Rss
  • About This Site
  • About
    • Clients
  • Services
  • Resources
    • Trust Me
    • Short Book Reviews
  • Contact

About this Site | © 2024 Team Leadership Culture | platform by Apricot Services


Back To Top
Team Leadership Culture
  • Team
  • Leadership
  • Culture
  • Myers-Briggs
  • Trust Me
  • Short Book Reviews
 

Loading Comments...