Team Leadership Culture
  • Team
  • Leadership
  • Culture
  • Myers-Briggs
  • Trust Me
  • Short Book Reviews
Top Posts
Obituary
REPOST: Four Functions, Three Rules
ROUNDUP: The Rise of AI
REPOST: Facing Adversity Series
ROUNDUP: Curiousity
ROUNDUP: Deep Work
REPOST: Character vs. Competence
REPOST: Opposite of Victim
REPOST: Listening With the Intent to Understand
REPOST: Performance vs Trust
  • About
  • Services
  • Resources
    • Trust Me
    • Short Book Reviews
  • Contact

Team Leadership Culture

  • Team
  • Leadership
  • Culture
  • Myers-Briggs
  • Trust Me
  • Short Book Reviews
Search results for

"decide"

BlogMyers-BriggsYou Might Be a Jerk If

You Might Be a Jerk If: Feeling

by Ron Potter January 4, 2016

You Might be a Jerk If

“Let’s change the topic, I don’t want to deal with this at the moment.”

“Look, it’s your fault that we’re in this mess anyway.  If you had made arrangements for this while you were on vacation it wouldn’t have happened in the first place.”

“I just don’t want to hear it any more, this is the way it’s going to happen!”

(If you didn’t start with the introduction to this “You might be a jerk if…” series, I suggest you make a quick review because it will help you better understand these subsequent blogs.)

Brenda is stuck!  Her dominant function is Feeling which helps her know what’s really important in most situations and appreciate input from just about anyone.  And normally, she’ll balance these great skills with either a good conceptual view of the world or a great grasp of the data, depending on her complete type.

There are four types that have this particular combination, the Introverted ISFP, INFP and the Extraverted ESFJ, ENFJ.  As noted above the dominant in all four cases is Feeling and the inferior in all four cases is Thinking.  These are what’s known as our Deciding functions, how do we decide what to do after we have taken in the data through our Perceiving functions of Sensing and iNtuition.

In a healthy state, these Deciding functions would then work in tandem with the “perceiving” functions of Sensing or iNtuition depending type.  But, under pressure or stress, Brenda begins to lose this natural balance, falling back to her dominant function which will expose her feelings, no matter how raw they may be.  Brenda will either become hypercritical or hypersensitive or both under pressure.

Balance, Balance, Balance

This is where team members and colleagues come into play.  It’s difficult for any one of us to break out of these pressure packed situations.  As colleagues, we want to help Brenda back into a balanced state by asking and sometimes even forcing her to use his auxiliary function.  Notice that Brenda’s auxiliary function could be either Sensing or iNtuition depending on type.  Let’s start with the Sensing balance.

“Brenda, we can’t ignore the topic right now, we need to make a decision this week.”

“I’m sorry I just can’t deal with it right now, there are just too many things this could impact.”

“Can we take a look at the data and see where that might be leading us and then discuss how that might impact the values of the company, if at all?”

“Yes, if you guarantee that we’ll see how these figures will impact the way we’re going to work this out with the people.”

As we begin to force Brenda to try a little balancing act, she’ll begin to regain her footing.  Note that we can’t tell Brenda that his data problem doesn’t impact our overall values.  Brenda has to come to grips with that through balancing her own natural Feeling and Sensing functions.

If we’re dealing with either the INFP or ENFJ than iNtuition is the auxiliary function, not Sensing.  The approach is similar, but focused more on the conceptual or future view (iNtuition) rather than the data (Sensing).

“Brenda, we really don’t think this new direction will impact our care and concern for the employees but let’s see if we can see a way through this.”

“I just don’t see how it’s going to happen.  I’m concerned we’ll end up in a very bad place.”

“We’ll, let’s talk through that.  Describe for me the outcome you see as most likely in this case.”

“It’s just not going to end well.”

“Well, let’s get a grip on the possible outcomes and then really talk through the good and bad of the situation and see how we could mitigate any negative outcomes.”

“OK, I guess we’re just talking anyway.  We can make the decisions as we figure out the best path.”

As we begin to force Brenda to try a little balancing act, she’ll begin to regain her footing.  Note that we can’t tell her where the scenarios will lead.  Brenda has to come to grips with that through balancing her own natural Feeling and iNtuition functions.

Stay tuned.  We’ll continue to explore other ways to conduct your own “balancing” act.  The best leaders have learned to balance their natural temperament functions with those of the people and teams around them.  It’s when the functions get out of balance or opposed to each other that we get stuck as individuals and teams.

When it comes to your temperament, balance, balance, balance is the key to success.

 

0 comments
0 FacebookTwitterThreadsBlueskyEmail
BlogMyers-BriggsYou Might Be a Jerk If

You Might Be a Jerk If: Thinking

by Ron Potter December 21, 2015

You Might be a Jerk If
(If you didn’t start with the introduction to this “You might be a jerk if…” series, I suggest you make a quick review because it will help you better understand these subsequent blogs.)

“I don’t care what you think and don’t confuse me with facts! This is our only way out! Besides, that’s just about the dumbest idea I’ve heard this century. Have you burned out all of your brain cells?
And don’t you dare challenge my intelligence or authority. I’ll make this decision and it will be the right decision.”

Bill is stuck! His dominant function is Thinking which helps him analyze situations and spot the pitfalls in advance. And normally, he’ll balance these great skills with either a good conceptual view of the world or a great grasp of the data, depending on his complete type.
There are four types that have this particular combination, the Introverted ISTP, INTP and the Extraverted ESTJ, ENTJ. As noted above the dominant in all four cases is Thinking and the inferior in all four cases is Feeling. These are what’s known as our Deciding functions, how do we decide what to do after we have taken in the data through our Perceiving functions of Sensing and iNtuition.
In a healthy state, these Deciding functions would then work in tandem with the “perceiving” functions of Sensing or iNtuition depending type. But, under pressure or stress, Bill begins to lose this natural balance, falling back to his dominant function which has a need for logic at all expense. Bill will either lash out in an unexpected (even out of character) emotional outburst or even if he keeps a calm exterior, be begins to take any comments or feedback as personal slights and criticism.

Balance, Balance, Balance

This is where team members and colleagues come into play. It’s difficult for any one of us to break out of these pressure packed situations. As colleagues, we want to help Bill back into a balanced state by asking and sometimes even forcing him to use his auxiliary function. Notice that Bill’s auxiliary function could be either Sensing or iNtuition depending on type. Let’s start with the Sensing balance.

“Bill, what information are you missing to make this decision?”
“I’m not missing any information, it’s just that the information we have doesn’t make sense!”
“Which piece of information doesn’t seem to make sense to you?”
“This one data set just doesn’t align with what we thought we knew. If it’s correct it will have a three week impact on the coding section.”
“OK, let’s think through that. What are the consequences of the three week impact on that portion of the schedule when we put it in context of the overall project?”
“Well, when I think about it that way it probably doesn’t make too much difference.”

As we begin to force Bill to try a little balancing act, he’ll begin to regain his footing. Note that we can’t tell Bill that his data problem doesn’t have much impact to the overall project. Bill has to come to grips with that through balancing his own natural Thinking and Sensing functions.
If we’re dealing with either the INTP or ENTJ than iNtuition is the auxiliary function, not Sensing. The approach is similar, but focused more on the conceptual or future view (iNtuition) rather than the data (Sensing).

“Bill, we’re not questioning your ability in this matter, but what information are you missing to make this decision?”
“I’m not missing any information, it’s just that the information we have doesn’t make sense!”
“Well, where do you think this information will lead?”
“I just don’t know. That’s the problem.”
“Let’s go back to your gut instincts. What is your experience telling you?”
“I’m pretty sure it has to lead us in this direction, I just can’t see it yet.”

As we begin to force Bill to try a little balancing act, he’ll begin to regain his footing. Note that we can’t tell Bill where the data should lead him. Bill has to come to grips with that through balancing his own natural Thinking and iNtuition functions.
Stay tuned. Next in our series titled “You might be a jerk if…” we’ll shift our focus from the dominant Thinking style to the dominant Feeling style. This one may have the most difficulty working in the corporate environment.

0 comments
0 FacebookTwitterThreadsBlueskyEmail
BlogTeam

Patience – A Balancing Act

by Ron Potter November 12, 2015
Source: WorldIslandInfo.com, Creative Commons

Source: WorldIslandInfo.com, Creative Commons

I think building great teams is tough. If you’re in a sports related environment, it’s more obvious that you need to build teams of your five, nine, or eleven players (or some other number). And even in these environments where the value of building a team is so crucial, it’s still difficult. In a corporate environment where it’s not quite as obvious that building a great team is necessary, it’s even more difficult to put in the effort to create a great team.

But for anyone who has been part of a great corporate team, the value of making the effort is undeniable. Patience is a key element to team building. However patience is hard to define or understand and difficult to balance.

Patience: “The capacity to accept or tolerate delay, trouble, or suffering without getting angry or upset.”

One of the images that I really enjoy is the two magnificent lions protecting the entrance to the New York Public Library. Their names are Patience and Fortitude.

Patience and fortitude. The capacity to accept or tolerate delay, trouble, or suffering without getting angry or upset and at the same time fortitude: courage, bravery, endurance, resilience.

Patience with self vs. Patience with others.

I’ve seen one Vice President get very upset with a 2nd Vice President when he did not think his colleague was dealing with what he considered to be an incompetent employee. What was interesting to me is that I was working with both VPs and I knew that each of them was dealing with a direct report that needed to be moved to a new position where they had a greater chance of success. Both VPs did successfully deal with the situation and both worked hard at accomplishing it in the most successful way possible. But while VP#1 seemed to exhibit great patience in dealing with his direct report (because he respected him and believed he deserved patience) he didn’t exhibit the same patience for the other employee or the VP who was proceeding down a similar path. How much control you have over the situation affects your level of patience.

Gumption and Patience

“Successful investing requires this crazy combination of gumption and patience, and then being ready to pounce when the opportunity presents itself, because in this world, opportunities just don’t last very long,” says Charlie Munger of Berkshire Hathaway. “It’s waiting that helps you as an investor and a lot of people just can’t stand to wait. If you didn’t get the deferred gratification gene, you’ve got to work very hard to overcome that.”

Investors in People

Charlie Munger is an investor in companies.  But, as you watch and read more and more about how he and his partner, Warren Buffet, decide on what companies to invest in, they’re really looking at the leaders of those companies who have built great teams.

Leaders are Investors in People.

0 comments
0 FacebookTwitterThreadsBlueskyEmail
BlogFavoredTrust Me

Favored Are the Caring

by Ron Potter October 26, 2015
Source: Paulo Philippidis, Creative Commons

Source: Paulo Philippidis, Creative Commons

Compassion brings us to a stop, and for a moment we rise above ourselves.
—Mason Cooley, City Aphorisms, Twelfth Selection

Dr. Albert Schweitzer was already an old man when Andrew C. Davison paid a visit to Schweitzer’s jungle hospital in Lambaréné, on the banks of the Ogowe River in Gabon, Africa. The three-day visit had a deep and profound effect on Davison, who later wrote of one event during the trip that impressed him in a special way:

It was about eleven in the morning. The equatorial sun was beating down mercilessly, and we were walking up a hill with Dr. Schweitzer. Suddenly he left us and strode across the slope of the hill to a place where an African woman was struggling upward with a huge armload of wood for the cookfires. I watched with both admiration and concern as the eighty-five-year-old man took the entire load of wood and carried it on up the hill for the relieved woman. When we all reached the top of the hill, one of the members of our group asked Dr. Schweitzer why he did things like that, implying that in that heat and at his age he should not.
Albert Schweitzer, looking right at all of us and pointing to the woman, said simply, “No one should ever have to carry a burden like that alone.”

Schweitzer obviously understood compassion. As a leader he decided to care for someone else, to fully understand the woman’s burden and seek to relieve it. In doing this he was supporting ideas taught by a compassionate Jesus who urged his followers to care for those who were hungry, sick, unclothed, in prison, and burdened with other problems—“Whatever you did for one of the least of these…you did for me.”
Compassion, as we define it here, involves two primary ideas: First is the ability to see people from their perspective, their level of interest, and their need. Coupled with that other-focused vision, though, is the deep internal craving to help them gain their full potential.
J. Oswald Sanders wrote,

The true leader regards the welfare of others rather than his own comfort and prestige as of primary concern. He manifests sympathy and concern for those under him in their problems, difficulties, and cares, but it is a sympathy that fortifies and stimulates, not that softens and weakens.

Compassion is a strong character quality that seeks to both understand people and motivate them to great personal and professional achievement. Compassion should not be confused with weak sentimentality. Instead, compassion involves caring strength, a selfless desire, and energy that elevates others to first place in all human affairs.

0 comments
0 FacebookTwitterThreadsBlueskyEmail
BlogTrust Me

Keeping the Band in Tune

by Ron Potter September 21, 2015
Image Source: Kevin Dooley, Creative Commons

Image Source: Kevin Dooley, Creative Commons

It’s all well and good to be a focused leader. That’s essential for helping an entire organization lock in and stay on target. But the supreme returns are reserved for focused teams. Just as every leader needs to clarify issues concerning personal passion and achievement, the team must undergo a similar process. A focused leader needs to lead a focused team.

Ron Rex, field vice president of Allstate Insurance, says:

On any given Monday, American businesses opens up their doors with no clue as to what or when to focus. A leader creates extreme focus!… In order to create extreme focus a leader must develop a constant flow of information that describes the progress toward a goal. On any given day, the culture of an organization will create distractions to goals. These distractions can be the normal business flow of others to out and out combat against current achievement. A leader that intends to create extreme focus on a goal or set of goals must be prepared to fend off organizational disruption from those led. This is achieved by creating an atmosphere of work and information that at times may seem attacking to the status quo but must always lure the team to focus harder on fewer things. In American business today, focus is the one weapon that is not subject to the decisions of others.

While consulting with one client organization on leadership matters, my colleague Wayne and I kept hearing from the high-level executive team that they were all averaging more than eighty hours a week. During the training we did with this group, the topic of the heavy work schedule kept surfacing.

We decided to put what we were doing on pause and take a closer look. Some questions needed answering: First, how could these executives keep up this schedule without destroying themselves, their families, and their teams? Second, with such demands on their time, how would they be able to change ingrained habits and actually start doing this “leadership thing” that they knew was important, but they never seemed able to focus on long enough to accomplish? Would our recommendations, if followed, now cause them to have to work ninety hours per week?

To get hard data on how these executives were allocating their time resources, we decided to use the Stephen Covey view of time management found in his book The 7 Habits of Highly Effective People: Powerful Lessons in Personal Change. Covey’s Time Management Matrix shows four categories of activities:

We asked the team to spend two weeks tracking their time and scrupulously recording what they were doing during these 80-hour marathons. We tallied the results and created a page on a flip chart for each person, cataloging that 8 of their 80 hours went to task A, 6 hours went to task B, and so on. All 160 hours were accounted for in this way.

The group assembled to hear the results. We wish we had a videotape of the assorted jaw-dropping responses we observed as we first revealed individual patterns and then moved on through a discussion process for the entire group. It was interesting and a bit entertaining when one person would identify an item as Quadrant III (urgent, but not important) and someone else would say, “Time out! If you don’t do that task for me, I can’t get my work done (Quadrant I)!” It took a great deal of negotiation to reach a team consensus on which activities belonged in which quadrants. However, through those negotiations, we discovered just exactly what each person needed.

In many cases one person or team was generating an entire report that took a great deal of time, while the person who needed the data might use only a single crucial piece of data from the entire report. Once we determined that the one piece of data could be generated easily and, in many cases, could be retrieved on demand by the recipient from a database, a gigantic amount of busywork was eliminated.

After completing the negotiations over quadrant assignments, we added up all the hours and determined that about 20 percent of the hours fell in Quadrants I and II (the categories that really matter if you want to focus the team), while 80 percent fell in the less important Quadrant III.

You can imagine the stunned silence that settled like a black cloud in the room. Finally one executive said, “You mean we accomplished all of our important work in sixteen hours and the other sixty-four hours each week were spent on busywork?” The answer was yes. More silence followed.

How had this bright, talented, and obviously hard working “band” gotten so out of tune, so unbalanced? For one thing, they had never sat down together for this kind of discussion and negotiation. The positive result was that they eliminated a tremendous amount of busywork right on the spot. As a team, they came to grips with the focus-destroying enemy called “the tyranny of the urgent.”

If we stopped by your place of business and did the same exercise, what might the results be? Have you and your team identified the important versus the urgent? Do you spend your time and energy on the important?

Don’t let that happen in your organization. Work hard at focusing the team.

0 comments
0 FacebookTwitterThreadsBlueskyEmail
BlogTrust Me

Doing the Right Things Right: Focus

by Ron Potter August 31, 2015
Image source: Hernán Piñera, Creative Commons

Image source: Hernán Piñera, Creative Commons

The sun is a powerful source of light as well as energy. Every hour of every day the sun showers the earth with millions, if not billions, of kilowatts of energy. We can, however, actually tame the sun’s power. With sunglasses and sunscreen, the sun’s power is diffused, and we can be out in it with little or no negative effects.
A laser, by contrast, is a weak source of light and energy. A laser takes a few watts of energy and focuses them into a stream of light. This light, however, can cut through steel or perform microsurgery on our eyes. A laser light is a powerful tool when it is correctly focused.
Leaders cease to be powerful tools when they are out of focus and their energy is dispersed rather than targeted. The following is a not-uncommon scenario:

You know the drill. It’s Monday morning. You arrive at work exhausted from a weekend spent entertaining the kids, paying bills, and running errands. You flick on your PC—and 70 new emails greet you. Your phone’s voice-mail light is already blinking, and before you can make it stop, another call comes in. With each ring, with each colleague who drops by your office uninvited, comes a new demand—for attention, for a reaction, for a decision, for your time. By noon, when you take 10 minutes to gulp down a sandwich at your desk, you already feel overworked, overcommitted—overwhelmed.

Rather than resembling a laser, too often we seem like the sun, just going up and down, splashing our energy anywhere and everywhere.

Focus management

David Allen, one of the world’s most influential thinkers on personal productivity, argues that the challenge is not managing our time, but managing our focus. He believes that with all that is being thrown at leaders, they lose their ability to respond. However, he is quick to add that most leaders create the speed of it all because we allow all that stuff to enter into our lives.
What happens to our energy? Allen says,

If you allow too much dross to accumulate in your “10 acres”—in other words, if you allow too many things that represent undecided, untracked, unmanaged agreements with yourself and with others to gather in your personal space—that will start to weigh on you. It will dull your effectiveness.

Not only will your effectiveness be dulled but so will your power. Instead of being like a steel-cutting laser, you will be like the sun, putting out energy with no focus. There needs to be focus because life is not just about running faster or putting out more energy.

The energy of stress

Another problem with unfocused energy is stress. When leaders are so wrapped up in all that is going on around them, they lose their ability to respond effectively. The stress comes from not performing at the level of expectation, which causes more stress. Leaders need to find ways to pull away or systematize the “stuff” so they can focus on leveraging their passion and realizing their goals.
Daniel Phillips, chairman and chief executive officer of SilverBack Technologies, says,

I’ve been innovating, building and growing start-ups for more than 15 years. I am energized by working with emerging technologies and have years of experience leading companies through the important growth phases from start-up to public offering or private placement, and beyond. Having led several ventures through these challenging phases,
I have learned that the most important leadership quality is “focus.”

With so much going on around leaders, focus may seem impossible or improbable to achieve. Employees, phones, pagers, e-mail, cell phones, problems, crises, home, family, boards of directors, and other people or things demand so much. We tend to spend our time managing the tyranny of the urgent rather than concentrating our efforts on the relevant and important things that make or break an organization.
So what should we do? Is it possible to better focus your focus?
The next few Monday blogs will focus on just this. Stay tuned as we zero in on what it means to focus.

0 comments
0 FacebookTwitterThreadsBlueskyEmail
BlogTrust Me

Standing for Something Greater

by Ron Potter August 3, 2015

Commitment involves rising above our own needs and perspectives to grab hold of a greater good. As psychiatrist and author M. Scott Peck reminds us:

“People are searching for a deeper meaning in their lives.”

The leader who understands this and who responsibly presents a great cause to followers will turn a key in many hearts and unlock vast reservoirs of creativity and productivity.

Image source: orionpozo, Creative Commons

Image source: orionpozo, Creative Commons

Standing for something greater relates directly to the values and vision of an organization. A leader’s stance for something greater not only meets his or her personal desires, but it strongly resonates with peers, direct-reports, and others who have a stake in the organization.

History presents many examples of great men and women who understood the need to lift up allegiance to something great. These people stood their ground and had the controlled strength to remain focused on the ultimate objective.

Susan B. Anthony was such a person.

She found her “something-greater” cause, a passionate pursuit that would claim most of her attention and energy for the rest of her life. She worked tirelessly to keep the issue of suffrage before the public by speaking, petitioning Congress and state legislatures, and publishing newspapers.

In 1872 she put feet to her convictions by defying the existing laws and casting a vote in the presidential election. What a scene at shortly after 7 A.M. on Election Day when Susan and several other women marched to their polling place.

The three young men supervising registration initially refused to let Susan and the others register, and a heated argument ensued. After an hour of debate, a frustrated Susan finally got the inspectors to relent when she told them, “If you refuse us our rights as citizens, I will bring charges against you in Criminal Court and I will sue each of you personally for large, exemplary damages!” This threat turned the tide, and the women were grudgingly allowed to register.

On election day Susan was allowed to fill out the paper ballot and cast her vote for presidential candidate U.S. Grant. But that was not the end of the matter. Later Susan was arrested and charged for casting an illegal vote. Hoping to gain more public attention for the suffrage cause, she refused to post bail (her lawyer paid it out of his own pocket).

At her trial the arguments were long and passionate on both sides. After the prosecution and defense were heard, in a surprising turn of events, the judge told the jury it must return a guilty verdict.

Susan and her supporters were outraged and claimed the trial was a farce.

Later, after reviewing the case, the U.S. Supreme Court decided women still could not vote. Unwilling to abandon her great cause, Susan fought on faithfully until her death in 1906. It wasn’t until 1920, with the ratification of the nineteenth amendment to the U.S. Constitution, that women were finally given the right to vote in the United States.

The self-sacrifice of women like Susan B. Anthony and their vision for something greater than themselves led to significant cultural changes in the United States. Today, many take it for granted that women can attend college, work in any chosen profession, and have access to every right available to men. This was not the case in 1872.

People in organizations can be caught in a similar trap. They don’t see anything past Friday’s paycheck. The organization offers them little vision, few or inconsistent values, and little or no opportunity to achieve. Granted, not every situation embodies a culture-altering, transcendent cause like woman’s suffrage. But trusted leaders know how important a higher goal is for individual and organizational well-being.

They always point the way to something greater.

0 comments
0 FacebookTwitterThreadsBlueskyEmail
BlogMyers-BriggsMyers-Briggs In-Depth

Myers-Briggs In-Depth: Decision Making

by Ron Potter May 25, 2015

MeyersBriggsIn-DepthDon’t be an Arm Chair Psychologist

One of the things I always caution my clients with is “You don’t need to remember what your Myers-Briggs Type is and you certainly should not try to remember what type everyone else is.”  For one, you’ll be wrong and secondly and more importantly, that’s not what you should be remembering.  What you should be remembering is what type of team or decision making process should I be conducting so that every type is fully engaged?  Full engagement from everyone involved will help the team become the best at decision making.

Decision Making Function

The two “middle” functions of Perceiving (Sensing vs iNtuition) and Deciding (Thinking vs Feeling) are considered the decision making functions.  Each of us cycles through these two functions on a continual basis from the time we get up to the time we go to bed.  When I first looked out the window this morning (in April) I perceived that it was snowing!  Therefore, when I went out the door for my morning walk I did not decide to wear my spring jacket.  This cycling process continues on all day through minor decisions and major decisions.  What do we perceive about the decision we face, how do we then decide?

Balance, Balance, Balance

I hope that phrase, Balance, Balance, Balance, has been seared into your brain through this series on the Myers-Briggs Type Indicator (MBTI).  This is the key to good decision making both personal and team decisions.

On the personal basis continue to grow in your ability to think outside your personal preference areas.  Often having a partner who has a natural preference set different from yours can be a great way of accomplishing this goal.

On the team side it can often be accomplished by simple discipline of staying focused on one preference at a time.  For instance, if you and your team are faced with a difficult or important decision to make, break down the issue into the four decision making functions:

Sensing: Ask the team to stay totally focused on the Sensing issues for the moment and ask questions like:

  • Do we know all the facts and what are they?
  • Do we have a clear understanding of the situation? Are we looking too narrowly?
  • What has been done already or what has been done in the past?
  • What is each part of the team doing at the moment? Are the efforts coordinated?
  • What if someone from a different industry came in, what would they see?

Intuition: Once you’ve exhausted the Sensing questions, move on to a more iNtuitive view:

  • Are there possibilities that we haven’t explored?
  • What are some other ways of solving these types of problems?
  • We know all the facts but what is the story or the implications?
  • Is this similar to a problem that other industries face?

Thinking: Once we’ve exposed all the facts and our intuitive reactions to them, begin to look at logical questions:

  • What pros and cons do we face with this issue: Shareholders, Customers, Employees?
  • What would be the logical consequences of each possibility?
  • Do we know the cost and/or revenue expected from each possibility?
  • What are the consequences of not acting at all (that is indeed a decision)?

Feeling: Finally but not least (this is often the more powerful of the four functions) begin to ask the feeling questions:

  • How does each of us feel about what we’ll gain or lose with each option?
  • What values do we need to pay attention to with each option?
  • How will people concerned (Shareholders, Customers, Employees, ourselves) react to each outcome?
  • Who is committed and capable of carrying out the solution?

And don’t forget to stop and reflect (Introversion) at each step along the way with our open discussions (Extraverted) about each issue.

And, use your Perception to make sure there’s an openness to all aspects of the problem while at the same time setting reasonable time tables (Judging) for advancing through the process.

Myers-Briggs In-Depth is a blog series in which I dive into each MBTI function with more detail, providing some practical applications for creating better dynamics and better decision making. Click here to read the entire series.
Interested in an overview of each of the four Myers-Briggs functions? Click here to read the Using MBTI to Great Advantage series.

0 comments
0 FacebookTwitterThreadsBlueskyEmail
BlogCulture

The Power of Stepping Back

by Ron Potter May 21, 2015

In Warren Berger’s book, A More Beautiful Question, he writes

“The term stepping back is often used when we talk about questioning—step back and ask why, step back and reconsider, and so forth. But what are we stepping back from?”

Image Source: Tim Green, Creative Commons

Image Source: Tim Green, Creative Commons

Later he says:

“It’s necessary to stop doing and stop knowing in order to start asking.”

I have noticed—as has Warren—that the stop doing part is actually the hardest in the business environment. In another blog, I write about a destructive attitude that I see in the business world today. That’s the attitude of quick deciding. When we enter meetings with the attitude that we must decide quickly we tend to shut down the diversity of thinking and questioning that may “slow down” the deciding process and yet it’s those diverse thoughts and “why” questions that most often lead to better, more innovative decisions.

Stepping back from the fast paced, globally connected, task oriented work world is difficult.

Years ago one of my CEO clients asked me what key elements I had observed in building great teams. I was pretty quick to answer because I had seen the pattern so quickly and consistently.

Teams need to be BUILT.

Teams that get offsite twice a year to focus on team building and leadership continue to improve year over year. But, it’s critical that during these meetings you have to put down the bats and balls. You can’t be reviewing the business and the numbers. You’ve got to kick off your shoes, get real with each other and deal with each other as human beings, not human doings.

I can elaborate later on the importance of these meetings and the things that tend to sabotage them, but for now, notice that this is a way of stepping back from the business in order to gain clarity about the business. I’ve experienced time and time again that stepping back from the numbers, pressures, and routines of the business and focusing just for a couple days on team, leadership, and culture brings a tremendous amount of clarity about the business.

Management is about providing answers; leadership is about figuring out the right questions. Are you and your team stepping back enough to see that questions that will propel you in the future or are you simply frazzled trying to come up with answers day after day? Step back! You, your team, and your company need it.

1 comment
0 FacebookTwitterThreadsBlueskyEmail
BlogMyers-BriggsMyers-Briggs In-Depth

Myers-Briggs In-Depth: Judging vs Perceiving

by Ron Potter May 11, 2015

MeyersBriggsIn-DepthWork or Play

I have set up the following two signs in a team meeting:

  • I have to get my work done before I can play.
  • I can play anytime

I then ask the team to position themselves along the spectrum between those two signs.  Once positioned it almost always correlates between their Judging vs Perceiving preference on this scale.  The J’s have a much clearer definition (and more differentiating) of what’s work and what’s play.  The P’s have a less clear and differentiating definition of what’s work and what’s play and certainly don’t believe that play has to wait until the work is done.

Business World Imbalance

Although not to the degree that we saw in the Thinking vs Feeling imbalance, my data base includes about two thirds with a preference for the Judging side and about one third on the Perceiving side.  Often this is a trained function.  The Judging function includes words like:

  • Plan the work and work the plan
  • Get things decided, settled, and finished
  • Dislike surprises
  • Decide quickly and expect others to follow through

While our Perceiving preference includes words like:

  • Enjoys flexibility
  • Take time to search for options
  • Like adapting to last minutes changes
  • Expect others to adapt to changes in direction

Much of the business world prides itself with the Judging approach to the world and even those who may fall more naturally on the Perceiving side have been trained and disciplined in the Judging functions.

How do you like your Vacation Structured?

One of the best ways for me to get at the true personal preference on this scale is to ask people what their ideal vacation looks like.  The more natural Judging types (like myself) want the schedule and events settled and planned in advance.  I want my airline tickets in place, hotel reservations confirmed, specific days and times for sightseeing, playing golf, relaxing, having “spontaneous” fun.  Did you notice that?  Scheduled spontaneous fun!?!  Yup, that’s us J’s.

Our Perceiving friends and family members on the other hand would tell us, don’t bother me with any of that detail, let’s just get up see what happens.  Maybe we’ll do nothing, maybe we’ll decide to do something, we’ll figure out what sounds like fun in the moment.  In the personal world you can easily see the different types.  Not so easily in the business world.

Hidden Preference

However, one thing that doesn’t change in the business world is the deeply ingrained beliefs about the purpose of meetings.  Our Judging types like to do their “judging” or deciding in public, in their extraverted world of meetings.  In other words, why do Judging types come to meetings? To DECIDE!  However, our Perceiving types like to do their “perceiving” or learning and exploring in public.  Why do Perceiving types come to meetings?  To LEARN and EXPLORE!

Lesson Learned

So the lesson to be learned her is that if you don’t put the purpose of the meeting clearly at the top of the agenda, the Judging types will enter the meeting assuming the purpose is to decide something.  The Perceiving types will assume we’re here to explore and learn which will lead to a decision at some later date.

Always Identify Purpose

Now, if you actually explain the purpose of the meeting up front, the Judging types don’t mind coming to a meeting where a decision is not expected but every effort is going to be put into learning and exploring.  And the Perceiving types are thrilled to come to a meeting where a decision is expected.  Just don’t leave either group guessing as to the purpose of the meeting.  One side or the other will be incredibly frustrated with the outcome when they don’t have a stated purpose.

 

Myers-Briggs In-Depth is a blog series in which I dive into each MBTI function with more detail, providing some practical applications for creating better dynamics and better decision making. Click here to read the entire series.
Interested in an overview of each of the four Myers-Briggs functions? Click here to read the Using MBTI to Great Advantage series.

0 comments
0 FacebookTwitterThreadsBlueskyEmail
BlogTeam

Surviving the Darkest Days

by Ron Potter April 9, 2015

In my previous blog on the book “American Icon” by Bryce Hoffman, I commented on the leadership style exhibited by Alan Mulally as he led the Ford Motor Company through some of their darkest days.  He exhibited two key characteristics, Humility and Endurance that are hallmarks of great leadership and may have helped him save Ford.

Photo credit: John Spooner, Creative Commons

Photo credit: John Spooner, Creative Commons

Dedication to Teamwork

But it may have been his dedication to teamwork that was equally important to the survival of Ford.  The auto industry and Ford in particular were not pillars of teamwork at the top.  While I’ve worked with many great teams within the auto companies, the warring chiefdoms of the larger corporation often seemed to be the culture de jour.

Self-Selection

When Mulally first arrived in Detroit, both the existing leadership team and the outside community (mainly the press) assumed there would be a clean sweep as Alan brought in his trusted team members from his years at Boeing.  But, Mulally surprised them all when he answered one of the first reporters that his team was already in place, meaning the previous team members of Bill Ford’s team.  He commented with a very particular statement that I have shared with many of the leaders that I’ve worked with through the years.  Build the right vision and culture and the people who don’t belong there and won’t work out in the end will self-select out.  Once they realize that you, as a new leader, are truly taking the team or company in a new direction and you endure through all of the setbacks, they’ll either get on board (as Mark Fields did in the book and is now the current CEO of Ford) or they’ll realize they don’t belong and figure out how to save face and move on.

The Tyranny of Competence

This may be the more difficult issue to deal with when creating great teams.  The Tyranny of Competence is a title Chapter in Robert Quinn’s book Deep Change.  Quinn states that “It is fairly easy to find an extraordinarily competent person who plays a particularly powerful role in the organization.”  “The person often argues, ‘The only thing that should matter is how well someone does the job.’”  In Mulally’s case, it happened to be the Chief Financial Officer (CFO).  This was not only a powerful role but a critical role. Hoffman writes of the CFO “[He] had devoted his life to Ford and worked as hard or harder than anyone else in the building to save it.  But he was dividing the company at a time when it needed to be united like never before.  He had to go.”

The Darkest Moment

In this darkest moment, when you would think that you need all of the hard working competency you can find, Mulally decided that teamwork was more important than experience and hardworking competency.  And he acted.  Mulally, was not looking for blind loyalty, he had demonstrated time and time again that he preferred to hear contrary opinions and radical ideas.  But the CFO was making decisions on his own that were contrary to the team decisions and enforcing them in spite of where the team and Mulally thought they should be going.  This was not going to work.  Teamwork was more crucial in the darkest of days.

What have you seen or how hard have you worked at really building team?  A lot gets written about teamwork in companies. What are you actually experiencing?  Share some stories with us.

1 comment
0 FacebookTwitterThreadsBlueskyEmail
Quick deciding vs quick learning
BlogTeam

Quick Deciding vs Quick Learning

by Ron Potter March 12, 2015
Quick deciding vs quick learning

Photo credit: Anne-Lise Heinrich, Creative Commons

I have observed what I believe to be a very detrimental shift in thinking within our corporate cultures over the last 15 years.

We’ve been inundated with instant communication that is with us everywhere 24/7 (I had one of the first Blackberrys as soon as it hit the market in early 1999). To be clear, I’m not railing against this technology. I love it and I couldn’t imagine running my business or staying in touch with my family and the world without it. But it has interjected a sense of speed and quickness that is altering the way we think and decide as we try to conduct business in a globally connected world.
However, this belief that we must decide quickly changes the dynamics of decision making in a detrimental way. Good decision making (See my post on Prudence) requires good deliberation. However, if we’re in a quick deciding frame of mind we get defensive when:

  • someone raises an issue that feels like it is not in line with the current thinking or
  • will open that proverbial “can of worms” if we entertain the idea, or
  • they simply don’t agree with the current approach.

Teams have developed all kinds of behavior to suppress, shut down or discount the questioning view point. This eliminates good deliberation and will lead to an inferior (or even wrong) decision.
The shift we need to make is back to a quick learning attitude and then use a good process to make good decisions. What’s interesting to me is that teams who have mastered this quick learning leading to good decision approach, consistently make decisions quicker than those with the quick deciding attitude (not to mention better decisions).
Get better at

    • Quick learning with a…
    • Team of diverse points of view and…
    • Practicing good deliberation techniques to…
    • Reach great and lasting decisions.

You and your team will feel more productive, less stressed and will also begin to gain the reputation as high achievers.

1 comment
0 FacebookTwitterThreadsBlueskyEmail
Newer Posts
Older Posts
  • Facebook
  • Twitter
  • Linkedin
  • Rss
  • About This Site
  • About
    • Clients
  • Services
  • Resources
    • Trust Me
    • Short Book Reviews
  • Contact

About this Site | © 2024 Team Leadership Culture | platform by Apricot Services


Back To Top
Team Leadership Culture
  • Team
  • Leadership
  • Culture
  • Myers-Briggs
  • Trust Me
  • Short Book Reviews
 

Loading Comments...