Team Leadership Culture
  • Team
  • Leadership
  • Culture
  • Myers-Briggs
  • Trust Me
  • Short Book Reviews
Top Posts
Obituary
REPOST: Four Functions, Three Rules
ROUNDUP: The Rise of AI
REPOST: Facing Adversity Series
ROUNDUP: Curiousity
ROUNDUP: Deep Work
REPOST: Character vs. Competence
REPOST: Opposite of Victim
REPOST: Listening With the Intent to Understand
REPOST: Performance vs Trust
  • About
  • Services
  • Resources
    • Trust Me
    • Short Book Reviews
  • Contact

Team Leadership Culture

  • Team
  • Leadership
  • Culture
  • Myers-Briggs
  • Trust Me
  • Short Book Reviews
Author

Ron Potter

Ron Potter

BlogLeadership

Warmer-Warmer-Cold-Colder-Warmer

by Ron Potter October 6, 2016

photo-1422020297037-97bd356cc312

My grandkids always loved that game where they search for the prize and are directed by words of “warmer” if they’re headed toward the hidden prize or “colder” if they are moving farther away.

Through the years I’ve met and worked with hundreds of executives in my consulting work.  Some of them I seem to gain almost an instant connection with while others seem to take much longer and many times doesn’t develop into a close relationship.  None of that has to do with respect or competence.  I have great respect for many of them but have not necessarily developed close relationships.

It does however have to do with warmth.

One exercise that I’ve run through the years demonstrates this and always surprises me and others with the results.  I’ll show a list of characteristic of a person they have not met but can assume are valid.  They include words like skillful, determined, intelligent, warm, practical and a few others.

I show a slightly different list to each half of the room (without the other half seeing the list) and then ask them to rate the individual on traits they might expect from that person.  These traits are always presented in pairs such as: reliable – unreliable, ruthless – humane, dishonest – honest.  The list is reasonable long and you can see the pattern.

When we finish the exercise one half of the room will give the nod to the more positive descriptors such as wise, happy, humorous, reliable, honest, unselfish while the other half of the room tends to give higher scores on the negative descriptors such as ungenerous, shrewd, irritable, unpopular and dishonest.

Why the difference?  You’re getting warmer.  Each half of the room received an identical list of characteristics with the exception of one word.  One list contains the word warm, while the other list contains the word cold.  Is the person seen as warm or cold?  That was the only difference between the lists.  Those with the word warm assumed the person had the positive traits listed above.  Those with the world cold assumed the negative traits.

Now here’s the scary part.  We judge a person as being warm or cold in the first 15 seconds of an exchange.  Now that’s not confined to the first time you meet a person.  It relates to the first 15 seconds of every exchange.  I’ve often heard people say, “As soon as Dave walks in the door I know what kind of day it’s going to be.”  That first 15 seconds.

Kids look for the prize of the game be getting warmer and warmer.  You’ll also collect the brass ring if you work at getting warmer and warmer.  Greet people so they know you’re genuinely glad to see them.  Be warm in that first moment.  You’ll tend to gain the benefit of the doubt throughout the day.

0 comments
0 FacebookTwitterEmail
Short Book Reviews

Idiot Brain

by Ron Potter October 5, 2016

idiot-brainRon’s Short Review: Dean is probably the most humorist neuroscientist that you’ll meet or read. He has a great ability to make complex issues understandable and fun. His book really helps us understand why at times we do such crazy things driving by a supposedly rational brain. Good learning.

Amazon-Buy-Buttonkindle-buy button

0 comments
0 FacebookTwitterEmail
BlogLeadership

Training Leaders

by Ron Potter September 29, 2016

One of my clients that I’ve worked with for many years asked me to get certified as an executive coach.  Now I’ll leave the judgment of whether I’m a good or bad coach to others (more on that in a minute) but I’ve been functioning as an executive coach since before the concept became popular.

I had been working with one executive for a few years when we had just finished a session with his top 40 leaders from around the world.  As he and I were relaxing in his office after the session and sharing some of our experiences over the last couple of days he said to me “You’ve helped me build my leadership team to a level of performance that I didn’t know existed.  And, you’ve helped me become a better leader than I could have imagined.  And, you’ve helped us build a culture that I believe will survive this coming global shake-out that we’re beginning to see.”

Now, for a guy who preaches that the first element of great leadership is humility, I have to admit that I was overflowing with pride at that moment.  Remember, the name of my company is Team Leadership Culture and he had just put his experience at the top of each of those categories.  What else could he have said that would have been more flattering?  Then he said something that absolutely shook my confidence. “But, your real value is …..”  In that flash of a moment a shock went through my system because I had no idea what he was about to say next.  He had just put my entire consulting practice framework, Team Leadership Culture, at the top of the list.  What else could he say?

“But your real value is when we sit and talk like this.”  I never thought that this time spent with leaders when we just sat and talked, shared, mentored, coached, learned together was of great value.  This was before the time when “Executive Coach” was a common word in our language but I learned that evening how valuable this was.  A CEO Executive Assistant once asked me “Are you selling drugs?”  I laughed because I hoped it was meant in a humorous way and said “no, why do you ask?”  She said “Because our CEO never grants more than one hour to anyone but when you show up he shuts off his entire afternoon and I just hear you in there laughing and talking.  Are you selling drugs?”

So why did I need my Executive Coaching Certificate?  It had been a corporate decision.  All Executive Coaches must be certified!  I did comply and while I did experience some value, my greater learning is that certification programs train you toward the norm.  Certification means you have been trained to meet certain standards.  It assumes there is a right way to approach coaching with systems, techniques and practices.  I find that coaching is completely unique with each individual and doing things a standard way can only lead to standard results at best.  When I asked the client that was pressing me to get certified if they had seen any difference between certified and non-certified coaches the answer was “no.”  There are good and bad certified coaches, good and bad non-certified coaches.

My conclusion to all of this rambling is that leadership is developed not trained.  Training by definition says to “teach a particular skill or type of behavior through practice and instruction over a period of time.”  A second definition is to point or aim toward something.  Leadership is dealing with the unknown.  Management is dealing with the known.  You can train managers when you know what to aim for but you must develop leaders.

Development by definition says to “grow or cause to grow and become more mature, advanced, or elaborate.”  Leaders need to be developed.  Mentor them, coach them, disciple them but don’t train them.  Leaders developing leaders takes time, dedication and the building of trust.  Are you a trainer or developer?  Are you being trained or developed?  Be/seek out that coach.  Be/seek out that mentor.  Grow!

team-leadership-culture-meme-9

2 comments
0 FacebookTwitterEmail
Absurd!BlogIn-Depth Book Reviews

Absurd!: Every Act is a Political Act

by Ron Potter September 26, 2016

A photo by Geoff Scott. unsplash.com/photos/8lUTnkZXZSA

I’m continuing my series on an in-depth look at a wonderful little book that’s twenty years old this year.  The title is Management of the Absurd by Richard Farson.  You may want to consider dropping back and reading the previous posts about ABSURD!  I think it will put each new one in great context.

Reading this one again was like receiving a body blow.  Not so much for the leadership and management perspective but because of the headlines of our newspapers almost every day.  Remember, this was written twenty years ago.  These statements are not prompted by today’s headlines but look closely at what our author is saying.

“Fighting for the rights of special groups has contributed to an erosion of civility that none of us anticipated.  When people are treated as representatives of special groups, society is fragmented.”

 

“It may even be that progress on rights has been made at the expense of the common welfare.  Enmity grows between groups at they compete for rights. “

 

“Rather than looking after community, each group looks after itself.  The common welfare suffers.”

From a business perspective I think we deal with this issue (sometimes well and sometimes not) by emphasizing the team.  Many leaders try to optimize each aspect of the business but in so doing set up (and sometimes even encourage) competition between divisions.  In the end this never works well.  The concept of systems thinking and optimizing the whole rather than the individual parts always works better.  To quote Bo Shembechler, the football coach at Michigan when I was in school, “The Team, The Team, The Team.”  The name of my business is Team Leadership Culture which puts building team at the forefront of any good organization.

I always keep my comments directed at the business world but this one has so many implications related to the community issues of our day.  Farson simply says “It may even be that progress on rights has been made at the expense of the common welfare.”  I do worry that all of our labels that start with (fill in the blank) “________ American” lead us down this path.

The issue in the business world seems so simple and trivial by comparison, just take off your functional hat and put on your company hat.  The Team, The Team, The Team.  Team first.

0 comments
0 FacebookTwitterEmail
BlogLeadership

Defeating Doubt, Arresting Avoidance

by Ron Potter September 19, 2016

“Holding the hill” when under fire can be a terrifying and lonely experience. A leader will face a long list of challenges, which, if not faced and disarmed, can turn the most competent person into a faltering coward. We have grouped these pitfalls to courage into two categories: doubt and avoidance.

Defeating Doubt

This foe of courageous leadership comes in a variety of flavors.

First, there are the personal doubts. We may doubt our abilities, our judgment, our talents, and even our faith. We look at a problem and cannot find a solution. We attempt to fix it but cannot. Doubt oozes into our minds, and we are frozen into inactivity.

Then there are the doubts about our teams or others we depend upon. Have you ever worked with people who are overwhelmed, stressed out, resistant to change, burned out, not working together, complainers, rumor spreaders, backstabbers, noncommunicators, whiners, stubborn hardheads, blamers, or unmotivated negative thinkers? When encountering such bad attitudes and behaviors that stall the progress of our teams, we are tempted to slide into despair, and our backbones turn to mush.

Next is doubt in the organization. We may see the company sliding down a hill to mediocre performance, abandoning the right values and a vibrant vision. It’s one thing to maintain your own personal courage in the place where you have influence. But it’s overwhelming to stand strong when the larger organization is waffling on its mission and embracing plans that seem doomed in the face of aggressive market competition. Your knees start to knock.

Also doubts may surface when organizational outsiders, like stockholders, start questioning our forecasts and plans.

To endure as a leader, you will have to disarm doubt with gritty courage.

Arresting Avoidance

Another courage-crippler is refusing to confront reality and act. If we employ avoidance tactics when we are tested and struggle, we will end up with even more frustration and trouble. We have seen organizations take giant steps to avoid any kind of pain and suffering. But the result is a dysfunctional organization, not a great company.

To quote Winston Churchill, “One ought never to turn one’s back on a threatened danger.… If you meet it promptly and without flinching, you will reduce the danger by half.” Avoidance confuses the entire organization. It causes “mental illness” in the company and on your team.

Avoidance-oriented people tend to move away from things that threaten them in order to protect themselves. Why? There are a number of reasons. Often it is due to excessive concern about embarrassment. We just don’t want to be embarrassed or, more often, to embarrass someone else. We hold back—we don’t tell the truth—and poor organizational or personal behaviors are perpetuated.

Fear is another culprit. Sometimes it just seems easier to run and hide. Maybe the issue will somehow just go away? That’s classic avoidance—a sign of cowardly leadership.

Another reason for avoiding problems can be oversensitivity to the feelings or opinions of others. We just don’t want to hurt anybody. The other person is so nice; why should she have her parade rained upon? Issues are circumvented, and facts are ignored. We avoid the short-term pain and inflict a longer-term problem within the team and the organization.

And then there is the old standby character quality that causes so many problems: unhealthy pride. Some of the people who are most adept at avoidance are very proud, especially if exploring the gory details of an organizational issue might make them look bad.

Leaders who develop a humble heart and a willingness to confront concerns do not allow pride to interfere. They are open to opportunities for self-growth because they are secure in who they are and are not preoccupied with themselves.

Avoidance holds back an organization whereas a commitment to improvement will positively influence your own development as well as the development of interpersonal relationships, teams, and overall company effectiveness.

It takes great courage to change a pattern of avoidance and seek instead to make improvements and overcome the pain or difficulty in making decisions, confronting people, or being overwhelmed by circumstances or self-doubt. It is not easy, but the benefits you will experience from making this change are far greater than the “benefits” of avoidance.

Freedom from avoidance enables leaders to focus attention on determining when a situation needs action and improvement.

team-leadership-culture-meme-8-1

0 comments
0 FacebookTwitterEmail
BlogMyers-Briggs

Myers-Briggs is a Crock

by Ron Potter September 15, 2016

This is the title of a Wall Street Journal article written by Steven Poole doing a book review of Dean Burnett’s new book Idiot Brain.  Actually Idiot Brain needs to become the title of a future blog as well.  I can’t wait to read his book.

But, is Myers-Briggs a crock?  Poole says that Burnett “eloquently dismantles some pop-psychology canards such as Myers-Briggs personality test, still a favored corporate tool.  “The tool is based on untested decades-old assumptions put together by enthusiastic amateurs, working from a single source.”

TRUE!

HOWEVER….

Why does it remain a favored corporate tool?  I don’t see many corporations these days spending money that they don’t believe provides any value.  No Myers-Briggs practitioner worth their salt ever claims the Myers-Briggs Type Indicator to be anything other than a great tool for understanding people.  We never claim it to be (or shouldn’t be making such claims) anything other than a model put together by two enthusiastic amateurs.

I had one experience when my client, a senior VP of a large pharmaceutical company, asked me to do some team building with her team.  One of her direct reports was a psychiatrist and ran the psychiatric department for the company.  When she heard that I was going to conduct a Myers-Briggs session she sent me a scathing email proclaiming many of the same issues as Burnett:

  • Invalidated testing
  • Decades old
  • Based on assumptions
  • Created by amateurs

My only answer to her was, “Humor me.  Your boss asked me to conduct the session.”  Well, after the session where the team seemed to learn a great deal about working better together, this same psychiatrist approached me very quietly, put her hand on my arm and spoke very softly into me ear saying, “Would you come run a session like this for my team, we could really use it.”

It’s a tool, a mental model.  One of my favorite bloggers is Shane Parish at Farnam Street.  In his Farnam Street Brain Food he often speaks of Mental Models.  This is how Shane puts it:

“Mental models are a framework for understanding how the world really works. They help you grasp new ideas quickly, identify patterns before anyone else and shift your perspective with ease.”

In my mind Myers-Briggs is simply one of these mental model tools.  I just conducted a session last week with about 20 participants.  As I walk through each process described in the model people always start laughing and enjoying themselves because they immediately see the examples in themselves and each other.  As Shane says, it’s a quick way of identifying patterns and shifting our perspective.  I’ve never finished a session without people telling me how much they learned and how they believe it can immediately help them negotiate their corporate, community and family relationships better.  Now that’s a useful tool, even if it was put together by a couple of enthusiastic amateurs.

team-leadership-culture-meme-8

0 comments
0 FacebookTwitterEmail
BlogTrust Me

Holding Strong

by Ron Potter September 12, 2016

For two years scientists sequestered themselves in an artificial environment called Biosphere. Inside their self-sustaining community, the Biospherians created a number of mini-environments, including a desert, a rain forest, even an ocean. Nearly every weather condition could be simulated except one, wind.

Over time the effects of their windless environment became apparent. A number of acacia trees bent over and even snapped. Without the stress of wind to strengthen the wood, the trunks grew weak and could not hold up their own weight.

Holding strong and enduring as a leader requires some “wind.” Adversity gives leaders an opportunity to strengthen themselves, discover what they believe, and communicate their vision and values to other people. There will be difficult times, but the difficult times—the windy days—help leaders grow stronger in their roles and in their faith and trust.

Holding strong comes with the turf. If you are standing strong for values and vision and for being a better leader, you will experience persecution and times of discouragement, adversity, and frustration.

Holding strong is a process. This is when a mentor can be so helpful by coming alongside the leader and objectively pointing out ways and opportunities to hold strong over an extended period of time.

Holding strong is also a journey. Doing the right thing can be stressful, complicated, and time-consuming, but ultimately, it brings fulfillment. Leaders need to focus on the small victories gained along the way. The journey builds character and confidence. The journey is rewarded when a leader sees the growth of his or her people, the growth of the business, and the achievement of the task.

After a career working at several jobs (railroad fireman, insurance salesman, Ohio River steamboat operator, and tire salesman), a forty-year-old man began cooking for hungry travelers who came by his service station in Corbin, Kentucky. He didn’t have a restaurant, so he served his eager customers on his own dining table in the adjoining living quarters.

It wasn’t long before more and more people came by to sample his food, so he moved his business across the street to a motel and restaurant. There he spent nine years serving customers and perfecting his special recipe for fried chicken.

In the 1950s “progress” caused the new highway to run around Corbin, and the man’s business ended. By this time he had retired and was living on his monthly $105 Social Security check. He began going from restaurant to restaurant, cooking his famous chicken. If the owners liked the recipe, a handshake agreement gave the restaurant the recipe in exchange for a nickel for every chicken dinner sold.

By 1964 this little endeavor had become a sizable business. The man, Colonel Harland Sanders, had licensed over six hundred franchises to cook his tasty chicken recipe. Ready to retire again, he sold his interest for two million dollars and became a spokesperson for the company. “In 1976, an independent survey ranked the Colonel as the world’s second most recognizable celebrity.”

Colonel Sanders did not allow himself to be defeated. He held strong and was not overcome by discouragement. How can we develop a similar attitude toward adversity?

team-leadership-culture-meme-6-1

0 comments
0 FacebookTwitterEmail
BlogTrust Me

No Guts, No Glory

by Ron Potter August 29, 2016

A photo by Joshua Earle. unsplash.com/photos/Dwheufds6kQ

On October 29, 1941, as the world reeled from the onslaught of the Nazi regime in Europe and faced a looming threat from Japan, Winston Churchill was asked to speak at Harrow, his old school. Near the end of his two-page speech, Churchill spoke the now famous words:
“Never give in, never give in, never, never, never—in nothing, great or small, large or petty—never give in except to convictions of honour and good sense.”
Churchill had experienced many crushing setbacks throughout his life and political career, yet he refused to give up. He was a man of extreme courage and endurance.
When leaders make decisions, seek to expand an organization’s borders, or want to execute an innovative idea or create change, they will encounter opposition and face the great temptation to conform or quit. How can they resist and stand strong? How can they acquire the bulldog will of a Winston Churchill and never give up?
Endurance is the result of two foundational character qualities: courage and perseverance. Both are required of leaders seeking the trust of others.

Adversity and Discouragement

“A man stopped to watch a Little League baseball game. He asked one of the youngsters what the score was. ‘We’re losing 18-0’ was the answer.
‘Well,’ said the man. ‘I must say you don’t look discouraged.’
‘Discouraged?’ the boy said, puzzled. ‘Why should we be discouraged? We haven’t come to bat yet.’ ”
Discouraged? Hardly. The boy was holding strong to the hope that his team could overcome any deficit. He was holding strong to his convictions.
No matter what the source may be, discouragement and adversity have a purpose:

  • to deal with our pride
  • to get our attention
  • to get us to change our behavior
  • to prepare us for future service

There are some wrong responses to adversity and discouragement, and they cause bitterness, doubt, depression, and hopelessness. But holding strong produces some right responses:

  • We gain our team’s trust because our actions match our intentions.
  • We focus on seeing things through rather than abandoning our values or vision.
  • We rely on God for the ability to endure.

I want you to build courage and persevere, to realize the sweet taste of standing strong for the long haul. Endurance.

Team Leadership Culture Meme 5

2 comments
0 FacebookTwitterEmail
Absurd!BlogIn-Depth Book Reviews

Absurd!: PRAISE WILL GET YOU NOWHERE!

by Ron Potter August 18, 2016

I’m continuing my series on an in-depth look at a wonderful little book that’s twenty years old this year.  The title is Management of the Absurd by Richard Farson.  You may want to consider dropping back and reading the previous posts about ABSURD!  I think it will put each new one in great context.

photo-1416677357736-79cd2bce22c5

Praising People Does Not Motivate Them

Praise is very useful indeed as a lubricant to help keep our human relations in good working order.  For one thing, people expect it.  This is the one area where our author praises praise.  People do enjoy being appreciated and it does improve relationships.  But as a motivator, not so much.

One area in which we can really see and almost feel this principle at work is when the work of a high- status person is praised by a low-status person; it is often seen as presumptuous or even insulting.  We’ve all been there and cringed at the moment, thinking of the person providing the praise as really sucking up or being completely unaware of how inappropriate their praise is coming across.

In the opposite direction giving praise establishes the fact that the giver is in a position to sit in judgment of the receiver.  Receiving praise in this circumstance can feel very threatening or at a minimum very uncomfortable even if the praise is positive.  We get uncomfortable when we’re being judged; good or bad.

So how do we motivate if praise doesn’t work?  We take the time to get engaged.  We learn, listen, understand, ask useful or sometimes naïve questions to stimulate our thinking.  Our author says, “What really does release creativity and promote achievement is when a manager takes the time to get involved in the employee’s work – learning what direction the work is taking, the problems and possibilities it presents, the way the employee is dealing with the task.  But involvement is demanding and time-consuming, which probably explains why many manager resort to praise as a substitute, hoping that it will accomplish the same results.”

Learning, listening and sharing.  Dealing with the other person as a smart, whole, capable human being.  Now that’s motivating.  When someone cares enough to take the time to listen, learn and understand it really engages people.

Too many leaders are focused on “doing” rather than growing.  If you only use praise and criticism, you’ll find yourself falling farther and farther behind because you’ve not taken the time to connect with your people on a real human level by getting engaged with them and their work.  Don’t just praise, motivate!

0 comments
0 FacebookTwitterEmail
BlogTrust Me

Create a Learning Organization

by Ron Potter August 15, 2016
Processed with VSCOcam with m3 preset

A learning organization differs from the MBO (Management by Objective) type of organizational structure in fundamental ways. In a learning organization individuals are continually reinterpreting their world and their relationship to it.

A learning organization incorporates the practice of continually challenging its paradigms and accepted ways of doing things. Built into the organization is a system that allows for the institutional structures and routine models of action to be regularly questioned and transformed.

As Peter Senge defines it, a learning organization is an organizational structure in which “people continually expand their capacity to create the results they truly desire, where new and expansive patterns of thinking are nurtured, where collective aspiration is set free, and where people are continually learning how to learn together.”10 In this sense, a learning organization is an organization that is continually expanding its ability to create and re-create the very patterns and structures by which it operates.

At least that is the goal.

Unfortunately, what we have found in our work is that quick decision making has won. In many cases, leaders have abandoned the learning organization in favor of the quick-deciding organization.

In times of chaos, confusion, and change, peacemaking leaders need to focus attention on making sure their organizations are quick learning rather than quick deciding.

The fast-paced environment of product development, competition, and shareholder expectations has forced many organizations to adopt a quick-deciding mentality. In this model, a team (much like a football team needing to score before time expires in the fourth quarter) is in a hurry-up offense. The goal is to make decisions. But as Tom Peters correctly observes, “As competition around the world boils over as never before, firms caught with bloated staffs and dissipating strengths—from Silicon Valley to the Ruhr Valley in Germany—are looking for quick fixes. There are none.”

So how would a two-pillar, peacemaking leader respond?

The goal of the quick-learning team is to seek out and develop opinion rather than steamrolling over it or quickly mustering forces against it. Feedback is highly desired rather than feared.

In contrast, feedback is offensive when you are a quick-deciding team. You develop “sides” on all issues. The competition heats up. Winning at all costs is what counts.

Members of a quick-learning team are all on the same side of the fence, looking at an issue with differing opinions, experiences, and ideas.

Meeting agendas are often a surprising enemy. Leaders, staring at an agenda, feel compelled to make decisions within the time allotted. In most cases, true discussion of the issues and everyone’s opinions (the rooting-out process) is bypassed in favor of table talk that centers on implementation.

We suggest a meeting agenda that maps out what the team wants to learn about an issue. Learning should be the goal with good decisions the result. Remember that the goal is learning quickly and then making good decisions, not just deciding quickly.

“Patience,” said Saint Augustine, “is the companion of wisdom.” Problems and day-to-day crises test our wisdom and our ability to make decisions under pressure. Great leaders are people of patience and constant learning.

It is the leader’s job to pull everything together into a quick-learning rather than a quick-deciding environment. The leader holds the dialogue together and asks questions that are designed to help team members clearly communicate their information and thoughts about the agenda item. In this way, the meeting’s goal is met: quick learning—rather than quick deciding—for the purpose of making good decisions.

The leader needs to develop not only an inclusive mind-set but also one that honors people for who they are and what they bring to the process. Each person brings unique strengths and outlooks to the table.

0 comments
0 FacebookTwitterEmail
BlogTrust Me

Building Team Dynamics – Part II

by Ron Potter August 8, 2016

photo-1414265247351-4afd13a3b4e6

Last week, we began to unpack what builds up healthy team dynamics. You can read part I here. This week, we continue with part II.

Manage Conflict

In his book The Fellowship of the Ring, the first book in the series The Lord of the Rings, J. R. R. Tolkien describes the camaraderie of a diverse group banded together by a common cause. Called “the fellowship of the ring,” their quest is to destroy the power of the Dark Lord by destroying the ring in which that power resides. Though they differ in nearly every way—racially, physically, temperamentally—the fellowship is united in its opposition of the Dark Lord. In a section omitted in the movie, a heated conflict breaks out among the crusaders. Axes are drawn. Bows are bent. Harsh words are spoken. Disaster nearly strikes the small band. When peace finally prevails, a wise counselor observes, “Indeed in nothing is the power of the Dark Lord more clearly shown than in the estrangement that divides all those who still oppose him.”

Conflict causes estrangement within teams, even the best teams. Therefore, managing conflict is at the heart of the dilemma of the leader who has good relations with individual team members but cannot get the group to work together.

Rivalry causes division. Debate causes hurt feelings or a sense of not being heard or understood. How does a leader keep an aggressive person and a person who easily withdraws engaged?

Kenneth W. Thomas and Ralph H. Kilmann created the Conflict Mode Instrument, which is “designed to assess an individual’s behavior in conflict situations.” It measures people’s behavior along two basic dimensions: “(1) assertiveness—the extent to which an individual attempts to satisfy his or her concerns, and (2) cooperativeness—the extent to which an individual attempts to satisfy the other person’s concerns. These two dimensions of behavior can be used to identify five specific methods of dealing with conflicts.”7 The methods are described as follows:

  1. Avoiding—Low assertiveness and low cooperativeness. The goal is to delay.
  2. Competing—High assertiveness and low cooperativeness. The goal is to win.
  3. Accommodating—Low assertiveness and high cooperativeness. The goal is to yield.
  4. Compromising—Moderate assertiveness and moderate cooperativeness. The goal is to find a middle ground.
  5. Collaborating—High assertiveness and high cooperativeness. The goal is to find a win-win situation.8

Leaders need to use the peacemaking qualities defined by the two pillars of humility and endurance to bring conflict to the highest level of resolution: collaboration. The cooperative environment means “I need to be humble.” The assertive environment means “I need to endure.” The two pillars, taken together, cause people to listen, yet hold firm in solving conflict through collaboration. When collaborating, individuals seek to work with others to find a solution that satisfies all parties. It involves digging into hidden concerns, learning, and listening but not competing.

Treat Employees as Investors

It is interesting to watch privately held companies that seek to go public. They hire IPO (Initial Public Offerings) coaches who work hard with the CEO, CFO, and COO to train them to attract investors. They work with these leaders to help them say the right things in order to sell their companies. They teach them which messages work and which do not.

Our question: “Why don’t companies do the same thing with employees?”

If you do a quick study on employee relations over the last several decades, we think you will discover that how employees are viewed and described has moved along a continuum from workers to commodities to assets. We do not believe that referring to employees as “assets” is a satisfactory description because so many leaders look at assets as disposable or upgradable. Leaders and companies would be more successful in building organizations if they thought of their employees as “investors.”

Leaders need to give their people the same compelling we’re-a-great-company-and-here’s-why-and-where-we-are-going reasons for success that are promoted to IPO investors or current stockholders.

Leaders need to ask, “How can we get employees excited about what we are doing?” This approach is basic to team building and goes beyond vision and mission. It’s a way to engage the greatest resource of people—their energy!

Alan Loy McGinnis, in his book Bringing Out the Best in People, tells us, “Talk may be cheap, but the right use of words can generate in your followers a commodity impossible to buy…hearts on fire.”

Isn’t that what all leaders want—team members with hearts ablaze for the company’s vision and goals? The leaders certainly want investors who are loyal, happy, and motivated to give resources. Treating your employees as investors will produce similar results.

0 comments
0 FacebookTwitterEmail
Short Book Reviews

Presence

by Ron Potter August 2, 2016

Ron’s Short Review: This whole concept of presence is a powerful one. It relates to true humbleness, great listening, being who you are in all circumstances. Great leadership lessons.

0 comments
0 FacebookTwitterEmail
Newer Posts
Older Posts
  • Facebook
  • Twitter
  • Linkedin
  • Rss
  • About This Site
  • About
    • Clients
  • Services
  • Resources
    • Trust Me
    • Short Book Reviews
  • Contact

About this Site | © 2024 Team Leadership Culture | platform by Apricot Services


Back To Top
Team Leadership Culture
  • Team
  • Leadership
  • Culture
  • Myers-Briggs
  • Trust Me
  • Short Book Reviews